Alternative Market Briefing

Regulatory: Opalesque Exclusive / White Paper: Is standardized portfolio pricing for hedge funds the key to keeping regulation at bay?

Wednesday, May 21, 2008 Add Comments Print Email Track Keywords

Kirsten Bischoff, Opalesque New York: The topic of hedge fund regulation has been dotted through the headlines over the past few weeks. It has appeared just often enough through news of further Presidential Working Group (PWG) meetings, comments by government figures, or finger pointing by US presidential candidates, to remain steadfast in the periphery of the news. In light of these pushes for hedge fund regulation, three providers within the hedge fund industry: Paladyne Systems – a technology provider, Thomson Reuters – an information provider, and NumeriX – which provides pricing and risk analytics – published a white paper on hedge fund portfolio pricing. It is a topic they believe whereby industry wide acceptance of best practices would be a solid first step towards keeping the hedge fund industry in control of what they see to be inevitable regulation.

“We are only delaying the inevitable. Either you are going to get together and figure out how to [self regulate] now or you are going to be told how to do it. This is a call for action to the industry to step up and deal with this challenge.” – Sameer Shalaby, CEO Paladyne Systems

Opalesque had a chance to speak with CEO of Paladyne, Sameer Shalaby, about the research paper and the next steps which these three companies are looking to take in addressing the challenges of pricing. Citing the many different perspectives involved in unified pricing practices, Shalaby pointed out that when hedge funds have had problems rooted in pricing discrepancies “Ultimately investors are the ones that suffer. And then regulators are dragged in as when a hedge fund blows up, or an investment bank blows up…and this problem is so far reaching and so intertwined with so many segments of the financial industry that the only way to resolve it is to bring everyone together and say ‘okay let’s deal with these issues and let’s try and come up with one standardized policy and process across the board.’ So that when a hedge fund looks at things they look at it the same way a prime broker, a data vendor, or an administrator looks at it.

Highly inconsistent, unreliable process
Approaching the topic of pricing from a provider’s point of view the paper reveals the many ways that even fund managers who are making every effort to conduct accurate portfolio pricing, still leave room for major discrepancies. “Most hedge funds are still using spreadsheets to document their pricing processes, with no database or electronic workflow to highlight the process by which prices are obtained and calculated….For now, without a transparent process and consistent operational approach, hedge funds don’t have a way to prove to investors that their pricing is reliable and market conforming.”

The major pushback on this point from hedge fund managers has always been the argument about guarding the secrecy of trade strategies. Shalaby and his partners recognize this argument but point out, “If there is a standard industry pricing process, where we all disclose the same pricing methodology across the board, we never have to worry about only disclosing how we price the [specific instruments] a fund trades because everyone is disclosing the same information. The requirement is not to disclose only what you are trading but agreeing on a standard across the board [for all instruments], not specific to one fund or another.”

Next steps
Much of the news has carried comments on regulation by hedge fund managers and not often have the wide network of providers within this industry been given a chance to vocalize what they see as the day to day problems of the inner workings of managing a fund. Paladyne, Thomson Reuters, and NumeriX hope to change that. “We are certainly going to be taking some of our recommendations and reaching out to the President’s Working Group, to share with them some of that. We will also be holding more closed seminars and discussions with industry leaders to discuss these topics. We would like to take a leadership role to address the challenges that we are facing. Clearly it is a process and we are hoping that by raising awareness everybody will work together to come up with a resolution in the not too distant future.”

The paper in its entirety can be accessed at:

Article source - Opalesque is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

Banner
Today's Exclusives More Exclusives
Previous Opalesque Exclusives                                              Back to previous page
Access Alternative Market Briefing
Creating Reinsurance Firms and Banks - New Permanent Capital Vehicles for Hedge Funds and Fund of Funds

Joe Taussig

  • Exclusive Webinar for Hedge Fund Founders and Partners only
  • Why Lock-Ups and Closed End Funds don't work
  • Creating a reinsurer or bank can provide significant amounts of permanent capital without a proportionate increase in risk
  • Proven Models: Learn from the successes of Buffett and Einhorn
  • Expert Speaker: Joe Taussig's expertise includes the generation of billions of dollars of permanent capital for hedge fund and FoHF managers
Warren Buffett started a hedge fund in 1956. Working out of his bedroom with $5,000 of his own and $100,000 from family and friends, he charged no management fee, but he did charge a 25% performance fee on returns in excess of 6%. 13 years later, after delivering compounded returns of roughly 30% (net of fees and expenses), he had approximately $100 million in AuM, 25% of which was his. He was very successful by any standard in today’s hedge fund industry.

Why Warren Buffett gave up his very successful hedge fund
Despite that success, Buffett quit cold turkey - to go into reinsurance and banking (many years later, regulators forced him to give up control of one or the other and he sold the bank). Armed with permanent capital from the reinsurance and banking businesses, a modest amount of very low cost leverage whose availability was independent of asset values, and market multiples on performance, Buffett became even more successful than he ever was in the hedge fund business (his investors did pretty well too).

Why Lock-Ups and Closed End Funds don't work
Modern efforts to secure permanent capital using lock ups or closed end funds have not been very successful. Resistance to lock ups is fierce and closed end funds generally end up selling at a discount to NAV and today, managers usually have to commit to repurchasing shares if the discount exceeds a certain amount (begging the question of whether it really is permanent capital) in order to complete the initial offering.

Learn from Success:
Drawing on Buffet’s blueprint 35 years earlier, David Einhorn and a number of investors in Greenlight Capital funded Greenlight Capital Re with $212 million in 2004. Einhorn manages all of the reinsurer’s investable assets. In May of 2007, Lehman Brothers and UBS took Greenlight Capital Re public (symbol – GLRE). Assets currently exceed $1 billion and much like Buffett, Einhorn benefits from managing the permanent capital provided by the combination of equity capital and premium generated reserves.

Despite a drop in the insurance indices of roughly 25% since its IPO, GLRE trades roughly 146,000 shares per day at a premium to book value (and very close to its IPO price of $19). Investors in GLRE have done better than if they had invested in the Greenlight Capital funds over the same period of time and also benefit from daily liquidity. Relative to their returns from investing in the Greenlight funds, UK and U.S. taxable investors in GLRE also benefit from taper relief in the UK and the elimination of annual K-1s and lower capital gains rates in the U.S.

Limited to founders (or partners owning more than 15%) of hedge fund or FoHF management companies
Participation in the Webinar on June 5th at 10 am New York time is limited to founders (or partners owning more than 15%) of hedge fund or FoHF management companies who would like to learn more about creating a reinsurer or bank in order to generate significant amounts of permanent capital and provide superior returns (without a proportionate increase in risk) for their investors. Provided that a founder or 15% partner is present, additional colleagues and employees from the hedge fund or FoHF management company may also participate.

Jun, 12 2008 at 10:00:00 (EST) (16:00 CET) | Register Now
Unique Intelligence & Insights on All HF Centers

Opalesque Round Table

* With leading local hedge funds and investors*
* All global hedge fund centers covered*
* 12 free issues per year!*

A SQUARE Faculty
Expertise on weather derivatives

Faculty David Friedberg CME’s platform is really geared at larger standardised contracts and our platform is geared at customised contracts

» Read More

ALTERNATIVE
MARKET BRIEFING
The Only Hedge Fund Newswire Read By Elite Managers
AMB Editor

Regulatory: Opalesque Exclusive / White Paper: Is standardized portfolio pricing for hedge funds the key to keeping regulation at bay?
» More

Webinar: Film Financing Investment Opportunities

Film Financing

Equity and debt financing opportunities in film entertainment Read More

NYMEX - CRUDE OIL - (Weekly) graph

Intermediate Term Trend: Positive Monday’s Close: $127.05 (+ .76) UPDATE: Guess what- another new historical high settlement on Monday. Once more, the market settled in the history books. We had been telling our readers,since we first commented, nearly four weeks ago, “The market is way overdone (overbought), but it’s tough to step in front of a buying frenzy”. All one can do is protect profits with prudently tight stops against long positions.